What's this all about?
Every student has the same goals, regardless of their neurological differences. Embracing neurodiversity as an integral concept, it is imperative to educate and empower students, families, educators, and institutions to better understand and support the unique challenges encountered by neurodivergent learners. All stakeholders should commit to promoting an inclusive academic environment where every diagnosis is respected and every individual is valued. Through fostering greater awareness and offering tailored resources, we can make the journey towards higher education more accessible and successful for all populations.
Simple Truths
The NEST Program is guided by four key tenets. These simple yet profound concepts encourage us to challenge our preconceptions, accept and embrace our differences, and seek out the growth inherent in risks and temporary setbacks.
We are all Neurodiverse
Most of the terminology around neurodiversity is a social construct. This is not to say that Autism and ADHD aren't real, but we have defined them using diagnostic criteria that were created by people. The way people think, act, and process information exist on an infinite spectrum - some of us just happen to be far enough to one side that there is a word for it. This does not make some ways of processing right and others wrong. To exist in modern society, we all need to be able to make concessions for each other and we all need to meet at each others' unique levels. Sometimes that means neurodivergent individuals need to adapt, and sometimes that means neurotypical individuals need to be flexible.
Neurodiversity and Intelligence are not Correlated
Neurodiversity represents a natural and valuable form of human variation, not a deficit or something to be corrected.
It's essential to understand that there is no direct correlation between being neurodiverse and one's intelligence level. Intelligence itself is a broad and complex trait, encompassing various cognitive abilities and not just academic or IQ test scores. Neurodivergence does not inherently limit a person's potential for intellectual achievement. Recognizing this helps in promoting inclusivity and better support systems that appreciate and nurture the abilities of all individuals, regardless of neurological makeup.
Everybody's Path is Different
Every college student embarks on a unique journey defined by personal aspirations, backgrounds, and challenges. This diversity of experiences shapes the educational landscape. For some, the path may be strewn with financial hurdles and the balancing act of jobs and studies, while others might grapple with academic or intellectual pressures. These individual paths, with their distinct obstacles, underscore the profound truth that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to higher education.
Given this variety, support is crucial. Educators who are responsive to the diverse needs of their students can make a significant difference in smoothing these varied paths. Similarly, being surrounded by supportive and informed peers and mentors can transform the educational experience. These supportive networks not only provide encouragement and understanding but also foster an environment where resources and guidance are readily available.
Everybody Makes Mistakes
Mistakes are an inevitable and integral part of the learning process. Lev Vygotsky emphasized the importance of the "zone of proximal development," a concept that identifies tasks a learner can perform with guidance but not independently. This zone is where mistakes frequently occur, as learners are challenged just beyond their current capabilities. Mistakes made here are not signs of failure, but beacons of the potential for growth. They provide critical feedback that, when acknowledged and analyzed, lead to deeper understanding and skill development.
In a supportive environment, where mistakes are viewed as opportunities for growth rather than embarrassments, individuals are more likely to take the necessary risks that facilitate learning. Vygotsky argued that learning is inherently a social process, enhanced by interactions with peers and mentors who can offer support, challenge thinking, and model learning behaviors.
A quick note on terms
There is real and valid discussion around many terms used throughout this website. Acknowledging that words have power, the use of certain terms needs some justification and clarification.
DISABLED - The APA and other style guides currently recommend alternating between "disabled person" and "person with disabilities as part of the discussion around disability-first language. On this site, disability is used only to reference legal definitions and is actively and consciously not intending to be used to identify anybody as being lesser.
NEURODIVERSE - The neurodiversity movement, an outgrowth of the Autism rights movement, is steeped in critical disability theory. The concept of neurodiversity seeks to challenge our understanding of what is "normal" and "acceptable". It calls for systemic changes in education, employment, and policy that respect and uphold the rights and dignity of all individuals.
NEURODIVERGENT & NEUROTYPICAL - As subsets of the broader concept of neurodiversity, neurodivergent refers to individuals whose neurological development and functioning deviate from societal norms, encompassing conditions like autism, ADHD, and dyslexia. Neurotypical describes individuals whose brain development and functioning align with what is conventionally considered normal.
About the Author & Project
I'm Ben, and I run the Tools for Transition & Work program at Foothill College in Los Altos Hills, CA. Our program provides a year of intensive academic and social training for students with intellectual disabilities, equipping them with the skills needed to thrive independently in college or their careers.
This resource originated from a Critical Theory class at Johns Hopkins University, where I was tasked with an open-ended assignment to examine my professional challenge— the disproportionately high dropout rate of neurodivergent community college students compared to their neurotypical peers—through the lens of a specific critical theory. I chose to apply Critical Disability Theory in concert with Orlando Fals Borda’s participatory methodologies to explore how societal norms consciously and unconsciously "other-ize" neurodivergent individuals. By dismantling these barriers and providing targeted support, I aim to demonstrate that concepts of neurodivergence and "normalcy" are, fundamentally, social constructs.
I encourage you to reach out to me via email at ben@ttwnest.org